best when viewed in low light

4.17.2007

School Sucks, Kill 'Em All!

I would like to use the case of Cho Seung-Hui to make another argument against the US education system, and I think it serves as another excellent example of an individual completely neglected and underserved by that system - to a far greater degree than Shawn Martinez. But I'll get to that later.



I am shocked by the public and media responses to this incident. Though it is, no doubt, a tragedy that so many lives were lost - it is a tragedy for some when any single person's life is lost, especially so uselessly and without direct fault - the "nation mourning", "innocent victim" propaganda, and the demonizing of Cho creates a morbid melodrama that we, the audience, watch like a TV mini-series. The imagery and language used to describe the incidents, much less the front page-level attention, serves only to further distance us from the contributing factors AND from any sense of social responsibility.



It is a tragedy that this occurred, but it is a worse and inexcusable tragedy that nothing will be done to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future because we - society - will not take responsibility for action.



How do we prevent people like Cho from becoming psycho-killers? I don't know, but I know that our culture adores the ostracized madman, and we contribute to his existence by idolizing and glamorizing feelings of isolation and alienation.



Ironic that, on the same day, the trial of the US Marines and Navy personnel who went on a rampage in a small Iraqi town, ruthlessly killing (and possibly raping) almost 30 innocent men, women and children, was postponed.



I see no sensational media coverage of the evil that our boys have done over there.



But then, the Iraqis don't look like this:



From the New York Times:



April 18, 2007
Gunman Showed Signs of Anger


By MANNY FERNANDEZ and MARC SANTORA


BLACKSBURG, Va., April 17 — Cho Seung-Hui rarely spoke to his own dormitory roommate. His teachers were so disturbed by some of his writing that they referred him to counseling. And when Mr. Cho finally and horrifyingly came to the world’s attention on Monday, he did so after writing a note that bitterly lashed out at his fellow students for what he deemed their moral decay.


Mr. Cho’s eruption of violence, in which 32 victims and himself were killed on the Virginia Tech campus here in a rampage of gunfire, was never directly signaled by his actions or words, several of his acquaintances said Tuesday. But those acquaintances were frequently disturbed by his isolation from the world and his barely concealed anger.


Joe Aust, who shared Room 2121 at Harper Hall with him, said he had spoken to Mr. Cho often but had received only one-word replies. Later, Mr. Aust said, Mr. Cho stopped talking to him entirely. Mr. Aust would sometimes enter the room and find Mr. Cho sitting at his desk, staring into nothingness.


“He was always really, really quiet and kind of weird, keeping to himself all the time,” said Mr. Aust, a 19-year-old sophomore, who, though finding Mr. Cho strange, had not thought him menacing.


Yet there were signs that his behavior was more than just bizarre.


Lucinda Roy said that in October of 2005 she was contacted as head of the English Department by a professor who was disturbed by a piece of his writing. Ms. Roy, rebuffed by Mr. Cho, contacted the campus police, counseling services, student affairs and officials in her department. Ms. Roy described the writing as a “veiled threat rather than something explicit.”


University officials told her that she could drop Mr. Cho from the class. Or, they said, she could tutor him individually, and she agreed to do so three times from October to December 2005. During those sessions, she said in an interview, he always wore sunglasses and a baseball cap pulled low.


“He seemed to be crying behind his sunglasses,” she said.


Ms. Roy said she had been so nervous about taking him on as an individual student that she worked out a code with her assistant: if she mentioned the name of a dead professor, her assistant would know it was time to call security.


In another writing class, Mr. Cho submitted two profoundly violent and profane plays. Ian MacFarlane, a classmate who now works for America Online, posted the plays on the company’s Web site Tuesday, saying they had horrified the rest of the students.


“When we read Cho’s plays, it was like something out of a nightmare,” Mr. MacFarlane wrote.



“The plays had really twisted, macabre violence that used weapons I wouldn’t have even thought of.”


As a result of them, Mr. MacFarlane added, “we students were talking to each other with serious worry about whether he could be a school shooter.”


In one play, called “Richard McBeef,” Mr. Cho wrote of a teenage boy who accuses his stepfather of murdering the boy’s father and of trying to molest the boy himself.


“I hate him,” the boy says of the stepfather in a copy of the play on the Web site. “Must kill Dick. Must kill Dick. Dick must die.”


Though the level of anger was clear to those who knew Mr. Cho, there is little that points to a precise motive for Monday’s events. Or, as a federal law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity put it: “What was this kid thinking about? There are no indications.”
There are just the snippets of a lonely young life: prescription medicines, ominous words and two newly bought handguns.


Mr. Cho was a 23-year-old senior, skinny and boyish-looking, his hair cut in a short, military-style fashion. He was a native of South Korea who grew up in Centreville, Va., a suburb of Washington, where his family owns a dry-cleaning business. He moved with his family to the United States at age 8, in 1992, according to federal immigration authorities, and was a legal permanent resident, not a citizen.


In the suite in Harper Hall where he lived with five other students, he was known as a loner, almost a stranger, amid a student body of 26,000. He ate his meals alone in a dining hall. Karan Grewal, 21, another student in the suite, recalled that when a candidate for student council visited there this year to pass out candy and ask for votes, Mr. Cho refused even to make eye contact.


On Tuesday, investigators were examining a note Mr. Cho had left behind in his dorm room, a rambling and bitter list of the moral laxity he found among what he considered the more privileged students on campus.


Centreville is an unincorporated community of 48,000 about 20 miles from Washington in Fairfax County. Mr. Cho graduated in 2003 from Westfield High School in nearby Chantilly, a large school that sends dozens of its students to Virginia Tech. At least two of Mr. Cho’s victims had also attended Westfield.


The Cho residence in Centreville is on Truitt Farm Drive in a subdivision of attached townhouses called Sully Station II. The family was not at home on Tuesday. But neighbors said three unmarked police cruisers arrived at the house about 10:30 p.m. Monday, and came and went throughout the rest of the evening. The neighbors had only nice things to say about the Cho family; the father sometimes cleaned the snow off his neighbor’s car across the street.


Every 10 years, lawful permanent residents are required to renew their green cards. Mr. Cho did so, and was issued a new card on Oct. 27, 2003. Applicants seeking a green-card renewal undergo a criminal background check through various law enforcement databases, said Chris Bentley, a spokesman for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. “Nothing showed up in those checks that told us he couldn’t have his green-card renewal,” Mr. Bentley said.


Mr. Cho went to bed early by college standards, about 9 p.m. He often rose early, but in recent weeks he had been doing so even earlier, frequently before dawn, said Mr. Aust, his roommate. Such was the case Monday.


Mr. Cho awoke before 5 a.m., then sat down to work on his computer and awakened Mr. Aust in the process. Mr. Grewal, who shares a room in the same suite, saw Mr. Cho in the bathroom shortly after 5 a.m.


As usual, Mr. Cho did not say anything to Mr. Grewal. No good morning, no hello, Mr. Grewal said. Mr. Cho stood in the bathroom, brushing his teeth, wetting his contact lenses and applying a moisturizer.


He also took a prescription medicine. Neither Mr. Aust nor Mr. Grewal knew what the medicine was for, but officials said prescription medications related to the treatment of psychological problems had been found among Mr. Cho’s effects.

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous4/18/2007

    I love you ... Keep writing the truth ... could it be that our perpetuation of the hegemonic society might be a good place to start looking at how and why WE created this killer?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4/19/2007

    Thanks for commenting! I love hearing your thoughts, so don't hold back!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous4/21/2007

    I have lived in Northern Virginia for 14 miserable years, and if any community could produce a serial killer, this is the one. The adults are totally immersed in social climbing - swerving through traffic in their oversized SUVs, prattling away on their cell phones, threatening to sue anyone who gets in their way. Their kids are raised by underpaid au-pairs and brought out for display at dinner parties like centerpieces. Ever heard of an HOA? It is hit-and-miss in other parts of the country, but they are pretty much universal here. Their basic purpose is to allow adults to legally bully other adults by telling them what color their house can be, what kind of fence they can have, etc. With the adults being such bullies, it is only natural the kids would follow suit. The kids are truly a sad case, but considering how and where they are raised it is surprised they don't all wind up in two camps - emotionally scarred like Cho, and the next generation of the self-involved. If there is a hell on earth as far as human nature goes, it is truly the metro D.C. area.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4/21/2007

    I have lived in Northern Virginia for 14 miserable years, and if any community could produce a serial killer, this is the one. The adults are totally immersed in social climbing - swerving through traffic in their oversized SUVs, prattling away on their cell phones, threatening to sue anyone who gets in their way. Their kids are raised by underpaid au-pairs and brought out for display at dinner parties like centerpieces. Ever heard of an HOA? They are hit-and-miss in other parts of the country, but they are pretty much universal here. Their basic purpose is to allow adults to legally bully other adults by telling them what colors they can paint their house, how tall their fence can be, etc. It seems only natural that with the adults being such spoiled bullies that the kids would follow suit. The kids are truly a sad bunch to behold, but considering how they are raised it is surprised they don't all wind up in two camps - emotionally scarred like Cho, and the next generation of the self-involved. If there is a hell on earth as far as human nature goes, it is truly the metro D.C. area.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous4/24/2007

    That's where I endured my HS years, too. So I know of what I insult.

    I thought the HOA-like community-mafia agreements ended in post-civil rights riot Chicago...but no surprise they're still around. I'd love it if you'd post a link or an article showing us what you're talking about!

    ReplyDelete

In the past...